A new report challenges the conventional narrative of 9/11.
Although you probably didn’t see it or hear about it on corporate media, a research team at the University of Alaska’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, led by Dr. Leroy Hulsey, Dr. Zhili Quan, and Professor Feng Xiao, Department of Civil Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, released yesterday for public comment their findings from a four-year study of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 on September 11, 2001. This is the first scientific investigation of the collapse of the building.
The study, currently available as a draft, concluded that “uncontrolled building fires” did not lead the building to fall into its footprint — tumbling more than 100 feet at the rate of gravity free-fall for 2.5 seconds of its seven-second collapse — as has officially been claimed. Instead, the study — authored by Dr. J. Leroy Hulsey, Dr. Feng Xiao and Dr. Zhili Quan — found that “fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST [National Institute of Standards and Technology] and private engineering firms that studied the collapse,” while also concluding “that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global [i.e., comprehensive] failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.”
Amazing. 18 years after the fateful day and we still don’t know what happened. All we have to go on is the official narrative. You know–Sunni terrorists armed with boxcutters managed to highjack jetliners then fly them through the most heavily guarded airspace on the planet and into the World Trade Center and Pentagon. Within hours of the attack, Osama bin Laden and his al-Qaeda network were blamed for conceiving, planning, financing and coordinating the attacks.
Coincidentally, the attacks on 9/11 provided a casus belli for the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), a neoconservative think-tank directed by William Kristol and Robert Kagan. PNAC recommended taking advantage of the defeat of communism to reinforce American hegemony by preventing the emergence of any rival. In its September 2000 report entitled Rebuilding America’s Defenses, PNAC anticipated that US forces must become “able to rapidly deploy and win multiple simultaneous large-scale wars.” Unfortunately, according to the authors of the report, “the process of transformation […] is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event—like a new Pearl Harbor.”
What an amazing coincidence. Since the attacks on 9/11, the neoconservatives have been able to wage multiple, simultaneous wars across the Middle-East, turning the region into a caldron of failed states. It’s almost like they were following the Yinon Plan, or something. Which brings us to the elephant in the room–Israel. The neocons are a small group of ideologues. Most are allied with Israel. Some are dual-citizens. Since the late 1970’s the neocons have created an ideology of American world hegemony, specifying that the chief goal of US foreign policy is to prevent the rise of any other power that could check US unilateralism. A key strategic objective of this policy is to fracture and balkanize the Middle-East.
Of course to maintain this ongoing narrative of the endless war-on-terror mandated by the attacks of 9/11 requires the aid of the corporate media but with all the investigative reporters holding our elite accountable that would prove impossible, right?
The corporate media has already told so many whoppers that anyone who believes them at this point is an idiot.
Still, the propaganda and censorship have only increased since Trump’s surprise election, with the corporate media labeling anything that deviates from their official narrative as “fake news.”
However, as evidence continues to mount that the official narrative is irrational, it becomes ever more clear that the reason for this media campaign is to prevent legitimate questions about 9/11 from receiving the scrutiny they deserve, even smearing victims’ families and ailing first responders to do so. “Never Forget” has become nearly synonymous with “Never question the official narrative.”
Yet, this 9/11 anniversary — with a new study demolishing the official narrative on WTC 7, with a new poll showing that more than half of Americans doubt the government narrative on WTC 7, and with firefighters who responded to 9/11 calling for a new investigation — is it still “crazy” to be skeptical of the official story?
Remember that everything we think we know is simply narrative.
Hack the narrative.
Update: No matter how hard the deep state tries to resurrect Russia-gate with a bullshit story about a spy in Putin’s inner retinue, the reality is that no country meddles more in our affairs that our erstwhile ally–Israel. Going further, there is much evidence that Israel was deeply involved in 9/11. See here, here and here.