Why should I obey the laws when our feral elite openly flout them?

A country is only as good as the application of its laws. Are they universal in the way in which applied or are they situational? If an individual’s morals are situational, the individual is without morals. If a nation’s laws are situational, that nation has no laws, and soon it’s a kleptocratic “banana republic”. That’s our situation in the US of A, where our laws are situational. There’s a rule of law for the elite and one for the rest of us.
Everyone knows and it’s deeply corrosive. One of the increasingly evident realities is that lot of Americans these days assume that if an official, medical professional or corporate flack spouts this or that claim, he’s not stating the truth to which the public must consent, he’s just telling another lie on behalf of his corporate or financial masters. That skepticism has gone viral, and is rapidly undercutting the our faith in laws and institutions.

Think of Sam-the-scam-Altman, who sounds increasingly deranged in his pronouncements about AI, but there are plenty of other examples, starting and ending with our fabricator-in-chief. By providing an ongoing demonstration our elite have convinced a growing number of people that all the benefits from the increasing bifurcated system of laws go straight to the billionaires, while the cost are borne by us.
The Trump Administration has turbo-charged this dynamic but both parties are down with the rot. And this provides more proof that we have two conservative parties, for Wilhoit’s law states that–“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” Paraphrasing Leona Helmsley–Laws are for little people.
Justice Richard Posner articulated a neoliberal justification for elite lawlessness. In An Economic Theory of the Criminal Law, 7th Circuit Judge Richard Posner states that the poor require criminal law to keep them within the confines of the “market.” “The major function of criminal law in a capitalist society is to prevent people from bypassing the system of voluntary, compensated exchange-the “market,” explicit or implicit-in situations where, because transaction costs are low, the market is a more efficient method of allocating resources than forced exchange.” The flip-side of Posner’s theory was that unlike the poor, the wealthy required only tort law to ensure their proper behavior. “This means that criminal law is designed primarily for the non-affluent; the affluent are kept in line, for the most part, by tort law.”

How’s that working out?
But intellectual hand-waves aside, neoliberal economists and judges have followed the Powell Memo blueprint to arrive at the present, where the US is effectively a kleptocracy. The second Trump administration is a preview of the model of governance that comes next: An indulgent, hollow-minded elected leader who gives billionaires and their companies carte blanche in exchange for their corrupt support. Eerily similar to the Weimar period in Germany before Hitler, the Democratic Party only helps create the conditions for the next Trump, but one who is more competent. Indeed, the Democrats are a second conservative business party. That party’s financial base is anchored by multimillionaires and billionaires that compose its primary financial constituency.
They are already testing out models as demonstrated by the parallel government created by DOGE. DOGE was an experiment in direct rule by an oligarch using Signal. This is illustrative in that instead of reforming the system of corruption what we’re seeing instead of any movement toward a rethink of neoliberalism is a doubling down on extractive models and repressive population control.

The bifurcation of laws extends to US foreign policies. I don’t know where to start but perhaps it’s that empires by their very nature are lawless. The US was pretty successful at keeping the terror and lawlessness on the down-low but the war on terror initiated after 9/11 abandoned any pretense where the “gloves came off”, to use Cheney’s infamous phrase. Torture, disappearances and murder followed.
There’s no greater example of lawlessness than the horror of Israel’s ongoing Gaza genocide, where the US supported and supplied and officially countenanced the Zionist rampage. Here again Wilhoit’s law applies where there are “…in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”. Think Zionist vs Palestinians.

But the lawlessness has only accelerated, where the recent American-Israeli sneak attack on Iran, begun with the assassination of most of its top political and military leadership in the midst of ongoing peace negotiations, was about as absolutely flagrant a war of aggression as has been seen in the modern world, and the same has certainly been true for Israel’s very numerous attacks against so many of its neighbors and assassination of their leaders over the last three generations.
We can’t forget Latin America, what Greg Grandin calls the Empire’s Workshop. Bolivia’s Attorney General was kidnapped after investigating MAGA’s Latin American fixer, Fernando Cerimedo, who faces drug-trafficking charges as well as the charge of attempted murder after allegedly ordering a hit on his ex-girlfriend Nadia Beller, after she alleged that he was involved with drug gangs and officials at the highest level. On Wednesday (Sept. 30), the country’s Attorney General, Roger Mariaca, was abducted by security forces, apparently without any kind of judicial order or due process, in the eastern region of Santa Cruz. That was according to Bolivia’s Public Prosecutor’s Office, whose headquarters in the southern city of Sucre, Bolivia’s constitutional capital, has been taken over by masked police officers.

No story of lawlessness would be complete without a MarA-Lago connection. A Wall Street Journal report last week about the corrupt and thuggish actions of U.S. ambassador to Greece, Kimberly Guilfoyle, who was engaged to Donald Trump Jr. In March, at a dinner in Athens attended by Greek and U.S. officials, Guilfoyle got into an argument with Greece’s energy minister, Stavros Papastavrou, in front of the other guests. Referring to the impending collapse of the Romanian government, Guilfoyle told the group, “We can do that to any country we want. We can do that here,” according to a person who attended the dinner and others who were told about it. The conversation became heated, with Papastavrou retorting that the U.S. couldn’t replace the government of Greece, which was elected by the people.
It should be a new reality TV show–Thug-Life–where the camera follows various Trumpian apparatchiks as they swagger around making threats.
Like I started with–why should I, or any American obey the law?
Our elite have sowed the wind with their abandonment of the law and now they will reap the whirlwind.































